Turtle Beer Rings and Other Edible Thoughts

February 6, 2017

One can immediately see the benefits of using crop byproducts to make beer rings that are edible by both turtles and humans.  Consider the boost to the sagging agriculture industry in the Midwest.  Newly elected President Trump is looking to bring jobs back to America and specifically from the Pacific Rim.  Let’s look at this a little closer.

These edible beer rings, as a novelty, are sure to become a fad.  What do Americans need more than a fad food?  Right!  This will just contribute to the problem of obesity in Americans (despite popular belief the largest consumers of canned beer in the world), and turtles.  So now we have to tackle the problem of turtle obesity.

In my ongoing discussion with my nurse friend about saving the sea turtles, we have a new development.  I’ve written about this before, how I got slammed because I tossed a 6 pack-canned-diet-drink-plastic-ring into the trash without breaking all of the rings.  I was responsible for the death of thousands of sea turtles by just that one act.  Well, she sent me this link to show that maybe I would be off the hook if this invention came to fruition.

http://time.com/4341726/saltwater-brewery-edible-six-pack-rings/

If you scroll down it tells you that a microbrewery in Florida is developing an edible retaining ring thingy for canned drinks that is palatable to humans as well as turtles.  I just had to respond… .

These edible products are made of the fibrous portion of the most commonly grown grains in the Midwest.  Of course, these polysacchsrides are known to cause flatulence and will thereby increase CO2 production doing untold damage to our precious ozone layer.  Think sunburned turtles.  Don’t worry about humans because the smart ones already use sunscreen and the others never have and never will.

But as to the science of this new product, I want to know how many turtles were sacrificed to find just the right product that is a biodegradable substance that is edible for humans and turtles.  If you’ve taken comparative physiology, you know that the differences in the function and physiology of the gastrointestinal tract of Homo sapiens and those of Chelonioideais differ vastly.  Or, maybe you didn’t.

Consider yet, if humans wore ready-to-eat clothing, well it would be embarrassing.  I mean, chewing on your belt is much easier, faster and maybe even better than a Snickers and Diet Coke.  So, now what is going to hold your pants up?  Oh well, they are edible, too.

Lastly, we all know that there isn’t a good deed that can’t be improved upon or expanded.  Consider Reefer Beer that is made out of marijuana and it is essentially legal everywhere.  The munchies are sure to come, the beer rings are edible, cause flatulence and a hunger that is insatiable.  And, the clothes are edible also!

Need I ask the question?

Where ‘o where is our culture going?

More food for thought (pun intended) from your grumpy Uncle/Brother Dave.

Weary

Fatherhood

6/19/17

Conveniently, it’s time to explore the institution of fatherhood.

Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines father as;

1: a man who has begotten a child (not related to gotten, like, “I gotten real drunk last night.”)
2: the founder of something, like America
3a : one acting to another in a way suggesting that of father to child
3b : an old man —used as a respectful form of address
4: a prototype, like the father of all hangovers (more often the mother of…)
5: a priest of the regular clergy
6: one of the leading men (as of a city)

And, of course, father can be a noun, a verb or adjective (paternal, maternal).

A father can be adoptive, biological or associative (stepfather).

The origin is Middle English fader, from Old English fæder; akin to Old High German fater, Latin pater and Greek patēr.

Synonyms (also used as terms of endearment) are dad, daddy, old man, pa, papa (also poppa), pater [chiefly British], pop and sire.

The first known use of father was in the 15th century (I think as a verb, not a noun.)

A biological father determines the sex of a child by donating either an X or Y sex chromosome.  Mothers can’t donate Y chromosomes because they don’t have any, for all practical purposes.

The paternity rights of a father with regard to his children differ widely from country to country (read culture to culture, state to state, city to city, family to family, father to father) often reflecting the level of involvement and roles expected by that country.

The beginning of recognition that the act of sex and the role of a male in procreation occurred somewhere between 10,200 BC and 2000 BC when humans began to develop agriculture and animal husbandry.  For centuries, the act of sex was a satisfaction of pleasure and not linked to procreation, cognitively.  This concept took a long time to develop under often extreme pressures of primitive rituals, religion, politics, economy and society.

If one were to look at the Wikipedia post for “Father”, they would find the cumulative effect of liberal, new age wimp-hood.  As in wimp the social slur, not WIMP the nuclear physicist’s definition of Weakly Interactive Massive Particles. But I digress too early.  Allow me to continue in a more orderly fashion.

In more primitive days and sometimes more modern days, a woman may have sexual contact with more than one man during the time in which she is capable of conception.  This made/makes the determination of paternity difficult.  Today, paternity can sometimes be determined with a reasonable degree of certainty with very expensive genetic analysis as well as cheaper, less accurate over-the-counter testing available at your local pharmacy or mail-in-sample services like “23andMe”.  Otherwise, the “father” of a child is determined by guess and by golly.

In fact, the common designation of father as the sire of a child is probably more likely wrong than right in terms of the history of the world.

I haven’t even come close to discussing the whole picture.  Consider the concepts of mix-ups at birth, stolen children, adoptive fathers, men who raise children of other men, women who intentionally deceive true paternity, human trafficking, war babies, royalty babies, babies conceived from rape and on and on.

Closer to the interests of our group here, the American concept of fathers has/is changed(ing) even as I write.

At various times:

A father was a man that found a fertile woman to bear as many male children as possible.  When she faltered or died, he would replace her with a younger/more fertile replacement.  The children were to stock the family labor pool and enlarge the family holdings and standing in the community.

A father was the head of the household, the wage earner, the provider, the leader of family values and the outwardly-seen decision maker for the clan.

A father was the sperm donor for the woman to provide children for social, economic, religious and self-aggrandizement of the mother.  In some cultures, the children were little more than fodder to increase political strength for the mother.

A father was a wallet, a paycheck, financial support for the family.

A father was a representative in the community providing respect, power and status to the family.

A father was a caretaker of the children, the house and an errand boy for the wage-earner mother.

A father was a source for vehicles of terrorist bombs.

Wikipedia opens their discussion of fathers with this statement, “In almost all cultures fathers are regarded as secondary caregivers [implying as the daily hands-on nurturer].  This perception is slowly changing with more and more fathers becoming primary caregivers, while mothers go to work or in single parenting situations, male same-sex parenting couples.”

The concept of a father as the natural loving, nurturing parent is ludicrous.  I’m not saying that fathers can’t be, but that they aren’t predisposed to be.  Father’s have abused their children in innumerable ways.  They have sold their children into slavery, bartered them for economic or political power, given them to causes such as being raised in a pedophile community to be used as whores for the tribal males until adulthood.  They have been abandoned to destitute mothers, to the streets and to society to survive or not.  They have been killed to lessen the burden of survival on the family, to lessen the tax burden and to otherwise sculpt the gender makeup of the brood.

Fathers of the 1950s America were idolized.  American TV had Father Knows Best, My 3 Sons and Make Room for Daddy as examples of the father’s role in the family.  In the 60s and 70s, not only did fatherhood take a nose dive in status but the whole concept of family started to fall apart.  The Mary Tyler Moore Show (a single adult woman without child, husband or family) and All in the Family introduced concepts that were new or spoofs on American culture.  By the 1980s, the concept of fatherhood was blatantly confrontational.  Divorce began to soar and the presumption was that the man was at fault.  Public billboards by the United Way featured fathers as the devil, with horns and all.  In the 1990s, fathers became more useful as whipping posts or dunces that were useful only to watch the kids while Mom worked or hung out with friends.  Now, fathers are continuing to be portrayed as incompetent dunces but with a more effeminate persona.

Now, I really only have two questions.

Are you a father and are you the father?  Just asking.

From your grumpy Uncle/Brother Dave.

Weary

An Army of Many Genders

June 18, 2017

Lest you think I’m joking, go read the article cited down below.  It is absolutely true.  Our esteemed US Army has done it again.  Again?

Yes, remember the recruiting slogan a couple of years, “An Army of One.”  Bet that one put fear in our enemies hearts.  Or, “Be All You Can Be.”  Where the Army was willing to take anything as long as it was as good as it could be.  Not necessarily up to any particular standard, you see, just the best it could be.

The slogan writers for the USA are not the cream of the crop.  Well now, the same standards are leaking over into the official US Army gender department, or whatever it is called.

To keep abreast of modern trends, the Army of Many is becoming gender tolerant.  It has issued guidelines for personnel to deal with the myriad of gender choices it faces.  Like when a guy becomes a girl and vice versa.  Quoting the guidelines, “All soldiers will use billeting, bathroom and shower facilities associated with their gender marker.”

Like what, a tattoo on the forehead?  I thought gender markers were the presence of 2 X or an X and Y chromosome. Silly me.

It even cautions that one gender may find themselves showering with a soldier of the opposite anatomy, anatomy that just hasn’t had the surgical correction yet.  “… there will be ‘mixed genitalia’ in military showers and sleeping quarters…” 

Moms and dads in America need to know this before they send their sons and daughters to military service.”

Shouldn’t the Army be at least as up to date as the elementary schools of San Francisco?

The guidelines even “…cover all sorts of scenarios – from shower stall etiquette to “transfemale” soldiers deployed to anti-LGBT countries.”  I know, I know, you thought that armies were supposed to kick collective asses not kowtow to social mores of the lesser nation.  What the hell is shower stall etiquette besides don’t drop the soap?

But the coup de grace is, “The Army has begun mandatory transgender sensitivity training for…dealing with a male soldier who becomes pregnant.”

I think someone in the Army watched Junior and thought it was a documentary.

From your grumpy male Uncle/Brother Dave, sharing guidelines “…mandated during the Obama Administration.”

Weary

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/06/16/armys-transgender-policy-includes-guidelines-on-male-pregnancies.html

http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/08/san-francisco-elementary-school-switches-to-gender-neutral-bathrooms-for-little-kids/

Earn Extra Money as a Research Subject

 

5/10/14

On a radio program this morning, there was a discussion on a “botched” execution.  First off, “botched” is in quotes because the guy died in the end so I think it worked pretty damn well.

But anyway, on the program a young woman was interviewed and she said, “I think it is horrible.  I mean he had to suffer for several minutes.  I am not against capital punishment but they should get it right.  They need to experiment more before deciding what drugs to use.”

Well, the prisoner didn’t suffer for several minutes due to the extreme degree of sedation  he was under.  Any suffering one might imagine was surely less than the suffering he inflicted on others.  But, I guess the woman interviewed is right, we need more research in the area.  I wonder if she wants to volunteer.

Anybody need some extra cash for Christmas this year?

More urgent news from your grumpy Uncle/Brother Dave.

 

Weary

Aluminum Foil and RFIDs

7/2017

RFID, radio frequency identification (or maybe, radio frequency idiot), chips are here and more will come. You think cell phones, wifi, and computers are easy to hack?  This makes that kind of hacking seem like child’s play.

If you’ve seen one of the modern movies, like a James Bond flick, where they put this little capsule under his skin, that is a RFID.  They aren’t all that large.  Or maybe you’ve seen retailers brush your intended purchase across a scanner before you leave a store so that the alarms don’t go off?  Some companies put one in the hand of it’s employees so they can automatically log in/out, charge food at the commissary or track their movements.

The RF part means that the chip puts out a radio signal when stimulated by a scanner.  It broadcasts whatever information is on the chip.

A simple radio scanner can read and reproduce said information.  The scanner can be as small as a cigarette lighter with a remote antenna that is as inconspicuous as a small coil of wire.  A small computer (like a raspberry Pi, the size of a pack of gum) can overwrite the information on the chip to what the hacker wants.

RFID chips are everywhere – companies and labs use them as access keys, Prius owners use them to start their cars, and retail giants like Wal-Mart have deployed them as inventory tracking devices.  Drug manufacturers like Pfizer rely on chips to track pharmaceuticals.  The tags are also about to get a lot more personal: Next-gen US passports and credit cards will contain RFIDs, and the medical industry is exploring the use of implantable chips to manage patients.  According to the RFID market analysis firm IDTechEx, the push for digital inventory tracking and personal ID systems will expand the current annual market for RFIDs from $2.7 billion to as much as $26 billion by 2016.”(1)

That was the news 11 years ago.

From your Grumpy Uncle/Brother Dave, wrapping my credit cards in aluminum foil as I lament my Maui experiences.

Weary.

1. The RFID Hacking Underground, Annlee Newitz, 05.01.06, https://www.wired.com/2006/05/rfid-2/

12/19/2020, Edit; The following links are YouTube videos on how easy it is to defeat RFIDs in your credit cards and key fobs. The Lock Picking Lawyer has a video showing that the shielding sleeves are easily defeated.

  1. How to Bypass RFID Badge Readers (w/ Deviant Ollam and Babak Javadi). The Modern Rogue. January 29, 2020. Retrieved 12/17/2020 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ccm1caB6bao
  2. How Hackers Steal Card Info, Just by Standing Nearby. The modern Rogue. March 27, 2020. Retrieved 12/17/2020 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qt2Gn2CoJ74