Fauchi-itis 4, Wrong Question

G.O.A.T.

You’re asking the wrong questions!

Answers to who, what, where, why, when and how presented in the form of questions, form the foundation of journalism. Significantly lacking in “this day and age.” Let’s see how this applies to Fauchi.

A publication subtitled ‘A paper titled The Unnatural [SIC] Origin of SARS and New Species of Man-Made Viruses as Genetic Bioweapons suggested that World War Three would be fought with biological weapons… Chinese scientists described SARS coronaviruses, of which COVID-19 is one example, as presenting a new era of genetic [bio]weapons.’1 So we have evidence that the Chinese entertain the concept of biological weapons.

Dr. Francis Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law, describes how Chinese biowarfare agents stole a sample of coronavirus from a Canadian P-4 (an evaluation of biosafety) level lab and brought it to Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). Since the publication of that paper, the majority of the world has come to consider the COID-19 leak to have originated from the WIV lab, either intentionally or accidentally. China continues to disallow investigations.2 Now, China has it’s very own ball to play with. And play with they did, at the WIV Bio-Safety level 4 (BSL-4 equivalent to P-4) lab with funds from the USA’s National Institute of Health.2 That would be your and my tax dollars at work under the direction of Fauchi and Collins.

But wait a minute, have you heard of the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989? I have. You should go read it, really. It specifically states that federal law will “impose criminal penalties upon anyone who knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon or assists a foreign state or any organization to do so. It also provides for extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense committed by or against a U.S. national.” It was passed, amended, by the 101st Congress of the USA on 11/21/1989. 3 So, under US federal law, Fauchi and Collins should be in jail awaiting trial.

But, let’s not stop there. International laws exist to dissuade and/or punish those that commit crimes against humanity. Remember the Nazis attempts to exterminate the Jews in WWII and the Nuremberg trials? Several international charters, statutes, and tribunals prohibit crimes against large groups of people such as murder, extermination and other inhumane acts.4 Wow, Fauchi and Collins just achieved international status, as criminals. I wonder where that goes in the resume of Dr.Science?

“A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.”5

What is gain of function (GOF)? In this case, it was to increase the infectivity in humans of a naturally occurring virus that could cause devastating respiratory illness in humans. Why? There is only one answer, to make it more disastrous to mankind. That is weaponizing a biological agent with malicious intent. Period! In 2015, “Subbarao explained that routine virological methods involve experiments that aim to produce a gain of a desired function…”6 It was pointed out at this symposium that GOF occurs in the lab and in the wild. In the lab, it may occur intentionally or unintentionally. For vaccine and treatment research, the virus is expected to produce human-like illness in a lab animal. If that research design is then made to be more infectious to humans, one has a real pickle on their hands. The project has risen to a potentially very dangerous level. Like, what if the virus escapes into the wild? Like COVID-19?

We, our government, partially funded this research. In the form of Fauchi and Collins. We, look in the mirror, caused this pandemic and the premature deaths of millions of fellow humans. At the time we may not of known what was being done, but make no mistake, we allowed this to happen under our watch. We did this. We will pay for this. In 2014, the USA put a moratorium on gain of function research in viruses.7 A symposium was held in 2014 and again in 2016, organized by the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, the NIH (Fauchi and Collins), and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (Bill and Melinda Gates, ie Microsoft) to help guide lawmakers in developing laws governing this type of research.8

Do you wonder why Fauchi and several congressmen, Senators Cotton and Paul to name the most heated, had their little tiffs during the questioning of Fauchi about his roll in COVID-19? It was because Fauchi has to deny everything to stay out of jail. He lied when he denied that research at WIV was gain-of-function. He lied and tampered with witnesses regarding the source of the COVID-19 virus. He has lied about the usefulness or not of lock-downs, masks and vaccines. In his visions of grandeur (consult the current DSM manual), he is science. And now Fauci exposes either his extreme ignorance of the laws and culture of the USA and/or his true beliefs in socialism and tyranny.9 Fauchi is a megalomaniac that needs to be prosecuted for crimes against humanity.

From your grumpy Uncle Dave.

1. Chinese scientists discussed weaponising [SIC]coronavirus in 2015: Media report. Published 10th May 2021, updated 10th May 2021. The New Indian Express. Retrieved 1/1/22 from https://www.newindianexpress.com/world/2021/may/10/chinese-scientists-discussed-weaponising-coronavirus-in-2015-media-report-2300620.html

2. Coronavirus is a Biological Warfare Weapon. Robert Skopec. 12/31/2020. Journal of Clinical Studies & Medical Case Reports Herold Scolary Open Access. Retrieved 2/19/2022 from https://www.heraldopenaccess.us/openaccess/coronavirus-is-a-biological-warfare-weapon

3. S.993 – Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989. Congress.gov. Library of Congress. Unsure of the date of posting. Retrieved 4/22/22 from https://www.congress.gov/bill/101st-congress/senate-bill/993

4. Crimes Against Humanity. TRIAL International staff. Date published unknown. Retrieved 4/22/22 from https://trialinternational.org/topics-post/crimes-against-humanity/

5. Romeo and Juliet. Shakespeare.This line – ‘A rose by any other name would smell as sweet’ – is a quotation from William Shakespeare’s play Romeo and Juliet, spoken by Juliet Capulet (Act 2, Scene 2) to herself whilst on her balcony, but overheard by Romeo Montague.

6. Board on Life Sciences; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law; Policy and Global Affairs; Board on Health Sciences Policy; National Research Council; Institute of Medicine. Potential Risks and Benefits of Gain-of-Function Research: Summary of a Workshop. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2015 Apr 13. 3, Gain-of-Function Research: Background and Alternatives. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK285579/

7. Experts debate risks, benefits of gain-of-function research. 11/10/15. Infectious Disease News. Retrieved 2/19/2-22 from https://www.healio.com/news/infectious-disease/20151119/experts-debate-risks-benefits-of-gainoffunction-research

8. Gain-of-Function Research Symposium Summary of the Second Symposium 3/11/2016. Published by Global Biodefense Staff 6/23/2016. Supported by Contract No. HHSN263201200074 between National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, the NIH and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved 4/22/22 from https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/gain-of-function-research-a-second-symposium#sectionSponsors

9. Fauci crushed for saying it’s ‘disturbing’ that a U.S. court can overrule the CDC. Gabriel Hays. Foxnews.com. April 22, 2022. Retrieved 4/22/22 from https://www.foxnews.com/media/fauci-crushed-saying-disturbing-that-u-s-court-can-overrule-cdc